-
Exposure to pistachio pesticides and stillbirth: a case-control study
-
Saeid Razi, Mohsen Rezaeian, Fatemeh Ghani Dehkordi, Azita Manshoori, Reza Goujani, Reza Vazirinejad
-
Epidemiol Health. 2016;38:e2016016. Published online April 30, 2016
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2016016
-
-
15,876
View
-
199
Download
-
6
Web of Science
-
4
Crossref
-
 Abstract
 PDF
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Stillbirth is an undesirable outcome of pregnancy. In light of the increasing use of pesticides and growing concerns about the possible health effects of agricultural pesticides, we investigated the effect of exposure to pistachio pesticides on stillbirth in pregnant mothers.
METHODS This case-control study was conducted in Rafsanjan, Iran from 2011 to 2012. A total of 125 females who had a recent stillbirth were included as the case group, and 250 controls were selected from females who had a recent live birth. For each case, two controls with the nearest propensity score to the case were selected. Data were collected using a protocol developed by the researcher that involved interviewing respondents and reviewing their medical records. Conditional multivariate and univariate logistic regression analysis were performed and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
RESULTS The ORs of stillbirth in mothers living in pistachio gardens and those who were exposed to sprayed pesticides, in comparison to the controls, were 14.1 (95% CI, 3.3 to 63.4) and 5.0 (95% CI, 1.2 to 28.6), respectively. No significant differences were found in stillbirth rates according to the distance between the mother’s residence and a pistachio garden or involvement in agricultural activities.
CONCLUSIONS The results of our study showed that exposure to pistachio pesticides during pregnancy may increase the likelihood of stillbirth in mothers.
-
Summary
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by  - Dietary zinc intake and body mass index as modifiers of the association between household pesticide exposure and infertility among US women: a population-level study
Jungao Huang, Liqin Hu, Juan Yang
Environmental Science and Pollution Research.2022; 30(8): 20327. CrossRef - Glyphosate Herbicide: Reproductive Outcomes and Multigenerational Effects
María Mercedes Milesi, Virginia Lorenz, Milena Durando, María Florencia Rossetti, Jorgelina Varayoud
Frontiers in Endocrinology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Pestizidrückstände in Gemüse und Obst und Outcome bei Frauen unter ART
Constanze Banz-Jansen
Gynäkologische Endokrinologie.2018; 16(2): 128. CrossRef - Perinatal exposure to a glyphosate-based herbicide impairs female reproductive outcomes and induces second-generation adverse effects in Wistar rats
María M. Milesi, Virginia Lorenz, Guillermina Pacini, María R. Repetti, Luisina D. Demonte, Jorgelina Varayoud, Enrique H. Luque
Archives of Toxicology.2018; 92(8): 2629. CrossRef
-
Disadvantages of publishing biomedical research articles in English for non-native speakers of English
-
Mohsen Rezaeian
-
Epidemiol Health. 2015;37:e2015021. Published online May 1, 2015
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2015021
-
-
20,201
View
-
221
Download
-
17
Web of Science
-
14
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
English has become the most frequently used language for scientific communication in the biomedical field. Therefore, scholars from all over the world try to publish their findings in English. This trend has a number of advantages, along with several disadvantages.
METHODS In the current article, the most important disadvantages of publishing biomedical research articles in English for non-native speakers of English are reviewed.
RESULTS The most important disadvantages of publishing biomedical research articles in English for non-native speakers may include: Overlooking, either unintentionally or even deliberately, the most important local health problems; failure to carry out groundbreaking research due to limited medical research budgets; violating generally accepted codes of publication ethics and committing research misconduct and publications in open-access scam/predatory journals rather than prestigious journals.
CONCLUSIONS The above mentioned disadvantages could eventually result in academic establishments becoming irresponsible or, even worse, corrupt. In order to avoid this, scientists, scientific organizations, academic institutions, and scientific associations all over the world should design and implement a wider range of collaborative and comprehensive plans.
-
Summary
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by - Analyzing the composition of the editorial boards in high-impact medical ethics journals: a survey study
Zhiwei Jia, Donghua Liu, Xingxuan Li, Tianlin Wen, Xiyan Zhao, Wei Li
BMC Medical Ethics.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - ChatGPT revisited: Using ChatGPT-4 for finding references and editing language in medical scientific articles
Osamah Mohammed Alyasiri, Amer M. Salman, Dua'a Akhtom, Sani Salisu
Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.2024; : 101842. CrossRef - Composition of the editorial staff of major spinal journals based on geo-economic background: A survey analysis
Zhiwei Jia, Donghua Liu, Xingxuan Li, Tianlin Wen, Xiyan Zhao, Wei Li
Heliyon.2024; 10(7): e28541. CrossRef - Triple Method Approach to Development of a Genre-Based Approach to Teaching ESL/EFL Writing: A Systematic Literature Review by Bibliometric, Content, and Scientometric Analyses
Xiuwen Zhai, Abu Bakar Razali
SAGE Open.2023; 13(1): 215824402211472. CrossRef - A technology‐based, financially sustainable, quality improvement intervention in a medical journal for bilingualism from submission to publication
Vivienne C. Bachelet, Máximo Rousseau‐Portalis
Learned Publishing.2023; 36(1): 73. CrossRef - Outsourced English revision, editing, publication consultation, and integrity services should be acknowledged in an academic paper
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Journal of Nanoparticle Research.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Revues prédatrices : une vraie menace pour la recherche médicale. 2 Evaluer leurs conséquences et engager une riposte
A. de La Blanchardière, F. Barde, N. Peiffer-Smadja, H. Maisonneuve
La Revue de Médecine Interne.2021; 42(6): 427. CrossRef - Low‐ and lower middle‐income countries advanced practice nurses: an integrative review
A. Scanlon, M. Murphy, J. Smolowitz, V. Lewis
International Nursing Review.2020; 67(1): 19. CrossRef - International authorship in leading world journals on incontinence and pelvic floor disorders: Is it truly international?
Wassim Najjar, Marco Abdo Mouanness, Georges Rameh, Tony Bazi
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2019; 241: 104. CrossRef - Fundamentos para la Elaboración de Artículos Científicos en Trauma y Cuidado Agudo de Emergencias (Parte 4): Recomendaciones para Organizacióny Publicación de la Escritura Científica en Lenguaje Nó Nativo
Andres M Rubiano, Raúl A Echeverri, Erica Johnson, Sandra Olaya, Laura Hernández
Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery.2018; 7(3): 183. CrossRef - Predatory publishers: Implications for pharmacy practice and practitioners
Ross T. Tsuyuki, Yazid N. Al Hamarneh, Margaret Bermingham, Eric Duong, Hiroshi Okada, Jeffrey Beall
Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada.2017; 150(5): 274. CrossRef - The necessity of conducting a comprehensive literature review within low-income countries
Mohsen Rezaeian
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.2016; 71: 117. CrossRef - Literature review in biomedical research: useful search engines beyond PubMed
Jochen W.L. Cals, Daniel Kotz
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.2016; 71: 115. CrossRef - The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities
Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Bekaidar Nurmashev, Alexander A. Voronov, Alexey N. Gerasimov, Anna M. Koroleva, George D. Kitas
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2016; 31(12): 1874. CrossRef
|
KSE
